1660 ti vs 1080 reddit. A 1080 is a good 15-20% + faster than a 1660 ti.

1660 ti vs 1080 reddit Nvidia 1660 super vs Nvidia 1080ti The 1080 is better then the 1660 super. A new 2060 vs a used 1080 at the same price I'd go for the 2060 every time. And I may be able to get the 2060 from marketplace used but they be a bit more costly? You seem to be linking to or recommending the use of UserBenchMark for benchmarking or comparing hardware. The games I mainly play are WoW, RDR2, Vermintide 2, (getting into Valorant) and newer titles like Darktide 2 and others that I can't remember. My monitor is a 24" Samsung @ 1080p, 75Hz that is being donated to me by a family member. If u not have a 144Hz Monitor and For 1080p i have to recommend the GTX 1660 Super. However it does have more VRAM, so a straightforward price/fps comparison isn't exactly accurate. But you seem to be confused over what you're buying. Doing 720/1080. I'd say for only 5% performance, the trade-off in power efficiency is worth. There is no Ryzen 3600 for laptops, unless you're buying one of those desktop-replacement laptops which is using desktop parts. i would go with 1080 ti honestly, i have a vega 56 that has samsung memory so i have a vega 64 bios on it. I was thinking, since my birthday is coming up, that I might splurge and replace my other janky secondary Onn-brand monitor with another 1440p one as well My current build is a ryzen 7, 3700x, 32gb Ram and and 1660 super. Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs. So some questions are -Is it worth it, or I rather stick to my 1660 Ti -If I do the change how much should I offer for the extra money. So im going to build my pc and i was wondering for a Ryzen 5 3600 if i should pair it up with a gtx 1660 super or gtx 1080 ti. For context, a 1080 Ti is about equivalent to a 2080/2080 Super. Would I be better off returning monitor for a 1080p so I can play on higher settings or should I keep the 1440p and drop the the settings for better FPS. What the 6650 XT has over the 1080 Ti is it has lower power draw, raytracing support (although it's not too strong at it), support for Resizeable BAR, and support 2060 is almost as good as a 1080 in most games, and notably better in games where Turing shines like Apex Legends. All while drawing 100w less which make it so much more power efficient. from_pretrained(. Max settings on Valorant, Rust, and League. Evga base warranty is 3 years, was it used even before? But yeah that's giga worth, which is why I'd be kinda sussed out by the offer. In any event you won't be able to get DLSS working on any GTX-prefixed card, as that functionality is only available in RTX-prefixed GPUs such as the RTX 2060 and RTX 3080. If you have a 1440p monitor and/or 144Hz monitor then the performance increase to the 1660 Ti will be much more noticeable and worth it. At the same price point or for just a little less (depending on the manufacturer) I can get a GTX 1660 Ti. I have heard a lot about scaling down to 1080 on a 1440 monitor making it look bad and I’m scared some of the higher graphic games will force me to do so. How come you feel the 5900x is bottlenecking the 4080s? Hyped as the "Ultimate GeForce", the 1080 Ti is NVIDIA's latest flagship 4K VR ready GPU. It's close to a 3050 (I wouldn't pay much more for a 3050 vs a 1660S) and beats the 6500xt. Pascal was also a big jump, 1080 was a destroyer when it was released, then only 10 months later 1080 Ti was released at a MSRP of +$50-100 over 1080 being almost 40% faster and with 11GB of DDR5X VRAM. If TPU's figures are accurate in this case, the 6600 is 35% faster on average vs the 1660 super. When you factor in newer games like RDR2 and Control that can better leverage the new features on Turing and Navi, the 2060 starts to pull ahead of the 1080 and the 2070 Super starts to pull ahead of the 1080 ti. 4k level power requires a step up to the 1080 class cards at least. At 1080p it is very competent still though I wouldn’t say it’s worth a buy just because if it’s age. I have a 3060 ti and a series X and even without dlss the 3060ti is still a large upgrade from the series x. I would spend the extra money on a 1080 ti but seeing how much a lot of them go for I think it'd be easier on my wallet for the other cards. GTX 1660 ti vs RTX 2060 for 3 1080p Monitors . I have an i7 8700 and a 144Hz monitor. So I was thinking between the 1660 ti or super and the 1080. Genuine question because id like to know before upgrading. rx 5600xt is more like a 2k resolution card. But in the meantime I’d like to know if it’s still good enough to run games that say they recommend an RTX 2060 or higher at decent enough graphics settings with a good frame rate. Without a monitor upgrade the gpu upgrade will be pretty much useless depending on what you currently have. I am only talking about native in titles like Cyberpunk/Alan Wake 2 etc. Then it depends on how much you personally value newness. Go with whatever one you think will work. I bought the 1660 super over 2 years ago when gpus were crazy prices and had always intended on upgrading when things improved price wise. Also downloaded the Geforce Experience and OC'd it. I didn't really wanna buy a new graphics card as well because the cpu will probably bottleneck it, plus theyre incredibly expensive at the moment. The 1080 is still above the recommended/ minimum GPU on a lot of modern releases. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at For some perspective, when I first got my 1080 I was gaming in 1440p. aka top GPU eaters, not indie games or PS4 games being released on PC now. Reply reply canned_pho Posted by u/Yoshi9909 - 1 vote and 11 comments About the same really, 1660 Ti might be a little bit better in some newer games because it's a newer architecture with better supported drivers. Whatever your means and capability are, I'd personally just get the stronger card. The 1080 ti i dont know how old it is the guy didnt specify, but on the screenshot of GPU-z it says Release date March 2 2017. 2060 Super is too weak to care about RT with it, so just straight up raster vs raster, I'd rather have the 1080 Ti. Benchmarks vs. On my 2060 i played with no RT Ultra settings at 1080p at well over 60fps. That said for your case the 1660 Super/Ti does look like the better pick. Some have even had 1080 TI (so a bit better but still) as their recommended. I use a 3080 for 1080p, as I much prefer high frame rate over visual fidelity, but that’s just my preference (am considering a 1440 though). Oh, and it proved to stand the test of time like no one GPU ever seen. I was looking a the Ebay used market and was wondering if i should buy a 1080 Ti for around 170-200 and sell my 1660 Ti for maybe 100-130ish dollars. There is now a reasonably priced 1080 near me second hand that I am tempted by. Is a gtx 1660 or a gtx 1080 better? I’ve seen so many posts about not trusting benchmarks and If you have to choose between the two then I'd say that the 1650 Super is by far superior, but both pale in comparison to the three 1660 models (standard, Super, and Ti). View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. I have a EVGA 1660 TI and it works perfectly for 1080p gaming. 3060 ti costs 730$ on official retailers so don't even mention it. 1080 Ti, 3080, 6800 XT, & More not doing any favours going for 980ti to Gaming settings - 1080p atleast 144fps in 90% games Soo here's my question, now I am planing to upgrade my GPU and got confused, I am getting a OEM 1080 8GB for 120$ (will attach pics too) And RX 6600 Powercolour Fighter 8GB for 135$ Plz pc gaming gods help me out in this andd tell me what todo Feb 22, 2019 · Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 100 watts lower power draw. I’m only considering this because I have a 144Hz monitor and trying to game on it with 1080p 144FPS. It supersedes last years GTX 1080, offering a 20% increase in performance for a 40% premium (founders edition 1080 Tis will be priced at $699, pushing down the price of the 1080 to $499). Cards that won’t really handle modern, graphically heavy, games. I've tried a few different cpu setups for the stream pc. The 1080 Ti is the faster card, plus has 11GB of vRAM vs the 6GB on the 2060 Super. The 2080 and 1080ti are roughly equal in performance and are best suited for 1440 or 4k gaming as 1080p is a bit of a waste of their power. I really can't see the series X pushing for 4k 60fps The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. Also now that the 1080 ti is 5 years old, the failure rate of those will get higher as it ages more View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Also if you are going to buy a prebuilt I strongly suggest you get the 1660 Super version instead as it is 30%-40% faster than the 1660. Great card for the price Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Fusion 15, gtx 1660 ti vs rtx 2070 max-q . I’m mainly considering between the 2060 and 1080. Compared to the 1660 super, the 1080 ti preforms on average 50% better though the 1660 will get ~2 more years of drivers. I want to get either 4070 Ti Super or the 4080 Super. Supersampling as a technology isn’t a new concept, but DLSS (and more specifically, DLSS 2. Its honestly a race between whether the 1660 will fall below acceptable performance first, or the 1080 ti will lose drivers first. I recommend this brand: I currently have a 5900x with a 2080 super, apparently for 1080p, there isnt any bottlenecks. Why not get faster card with much more Vram? Reply reply I have streamed 1080p 60hz before with a gtx 1060 just fine so as the 1660 is 10% faster it would handle streaming while playing games that give 70-90fps (without streaming) very well. To my knowledge, the 2060 has an average of about 15% better performance across the board than the 1660 Ti. 4070ti super would easily last 7 years in 1080p. I have a 1660 super which I'm extremely happy with but now with the Final Fantasy VII Remaster release on PC I saw the recommended requirements, they recommend a GTX 1080 so I'm kind of hesitating if I should buy the game or it's a high risk of performing poorly with my graphics card. on one hand vega is still being put in even the newest mobile chips so its gonna be supported longer. Cyberpunk disappointed most thb. The 1660 Ti is great for 1440p 60Hz, while the 1080 Ti is capable of running AAA games in 1440p at 144Hz, making it roughly twice as fast. The 1080 ti is a The jump from 1080 to 1440 is generally better value than 4K in terms of how good it looks vs the loss in performance. If gaming on GPU costly games at 1080p can it make a big difference In these case, I will lower my resolution to 1080p at ultra or lower the in graphics settings to high. But the 1080 ti is the best performing apparently but is also the oldest. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti . I've tried a 1600x, 8700, 3600 and a 8th gen pentium(for S and G), A friend of mine has the same setup in his gaming pc (3600,32gb,3060ti) and in his stream pc a 8700 and 1660 ti. Hi, I'm debating between the GTX 1660ti and the Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now 1660 Ti vs GTX 1070 . Plus the 3060 ti is better than a 2080 super not the same as a 2070 super. Sure 2060 Super has DLSS 14 votes, 12 comments. That said, I would also look at an AMD RX 5700 (XT), or RX 6600 (XT) those are much better than the GTX 1660 TI, and equivalent Well there is a huge difference between the 1080 Ti and the 1660S for starters. these video from Hardware Unboxed and Tech Deals (this one is a GTX 1660 review but also contains comparison with RX580 and GTX 1660Ti, worth to watch) should give you very good insight in terms of performance per dollar, and which one should you buy. to("xpu")). Yeah it's just you have to ask "do those features matter?". 1660 vs 1080 Hey guys I’m really knew to building and parts and just as the title says I have an opportunity to purchase a 1660 used and a power supply for 300 total, or I can purchase a fairly new 1080 for 450. With a GTX 1080 TI if you want 60FPS with need to lower the resolution to 480p. . I think 1660 super is perfectly 1080 capable card. Please know that they have been at the center of drama due to accusations of being biased towards certain brands, using outdated or nonsensical means to score products, as well as several other things that you should know. In Metro Exodus some outdoor scenes in with the latest update would work at 60FPS, but as soon you stepped in doors, the frame rate would drop to below 10. The 1080 lasted me 6 years. Performance degredation isn't really a thing, the only risk with older graphics cards is that driver support will end sooner but the 1080 Ti is quite a bit faster then a 1660 Super so you should see a decent performance boost as long as you aren't CPU bottlenecked. Buy a 1080p 144+ hz monitor or 1440p 144hz (what I’d get) and then the best gpu with the rest of your budget. While from what i've seen they technically work, the output isn't that great or stable. It will simply allow you to play more games at 1440p at a higher refresh rate. true. That's like comparing a couple sports cars to a moped. If I'm not wrong the Super has a bit of headroom in terms of memory bandwidth, while the TI has its benefits in CUDA core count and clock speed (like, a 150 MHz difference), which ultimately makes little difference in fps (3 or 4 in most AAA games) What the 1080 Ti has going for it is an extra 3 GB VRAM, and it's an NVIDIA card so it has CUDA (you may need CUDA if you use one of those workstation programs that make use of CUDA). If pitted against a 1080, the 1080 is straight up better unless you need a feature specific to the 2000/1600 series. So a very similar jump to yours in pure hardware perf. Jul 30, 2023 · As for between the GTX 1660 TI or GTX 1080 TI, 1080 TI all the way. If you are just gaming at 1080p/60Hz then I don't think it's really worth upgrading as the 480 will still be able to play pretty much every game at high settings 1080p 60fps. An old 1060, 1660 etc could run 1080p 75hz on most games. A 1080 is a good 15-20% + faster than a 1660 ti. The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. 1080 Tis are great cards, but they're pretty old at this point. The price is absolute amazing for this performance starting at 220€ and has the same performance as the older 1660Ti and almost as good as the expensive RTX 2060. There's also the 6650 xt for $240 but I don't think it's much better than the 6600 xt. 1080 is a better card if you are comfortable going used go for it! Those all sounds good but the 1080 will still play games at higher fps. So no increase in performance per dollar. The 1080 would play everything (nearly) maxed out at about 90 to 100 fps in 1440p. If it were me purchasing this card with my current knowledge of the card I own, I would go for the 1660 Ti. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at The 1660 ti and 1070 are generally 1080p and 1440p cards. Posted by u/dGVlbjwzaGVudGFp - 1 vote and 8 comments 1660 ti for 1080p or 1440p gaming? I'm looking to upgrade my monitor, however I don't know whether I should be looking at a 1080p monitor or a 1440p monitor. I would personally go with the GTX 1660 Ti. Apr 24, 2019 · I've recently come across a used (but in good condition, still has warranty) GTX 1080 for 350€ (392$) and the GTX 1660 Ti (new) is 320€ (359$). I can buy a used 1080 for 270$ and the 1660 ti costs 80$ more. I'd probably wait another generation or save up a bit more unless you're desperate to play a game that you can't currently play. You get similiar performance for a brand new card with warranty , much more efficient card , longer driver support and new architecture which means you’ll get more performance gains from drivers in the future. I use it for medium settings on Cold War & Apex. To be clear, I'm not saying the GTX 1080 ti offers the same performance as the RTX 4090. on the other hand 1080 ti is probably gonna stay more powerfull throughout its useable life and its resale value is gonna be higher when hopefully gpu prices go back down, vega was at one The 1080 TI sure is a good card, but neither of those other 2 options consume as little power as the 6600Xt does. Which one should I get? I stream a bit, but not Based on 1,158,830 user benchmarks for the Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti and the GTX 1660-Ti, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 722 GPUs. GTX 1080 TI vs RX 6600 Tested in 10 games at 1440p Even the RX 6600 ($250) is only ever so slightly behind. Posted by u/DeadSaiint - 25 votes and 14 comments MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB GDRR6 - 192-bit HDMI/DP, Dual Fan, VR Ready, OC Graphics Card for Gaming PC, NVIDIA Video Card GPU (GTX 1660 TI Ventus XS 6G OC) Computer Graphics Cards (Renewed) $180 And the 1080 Ti review shows it's quite far above the gtx 1080 Alternatively you can watch a direct comparison from another channel as hardware unboxed normally separates there high performance and midrange data so in this case you need to go elsewhere Currently stuck between ordering a used 1080 ti for ~190 or buying a 6600 xt brand new for $230. Only a higher ceiling of performance at the low low price of $1200. Any advice would be appreciated! 6600xt is the go-to 1080p card at the moment, but if money's tight and it's cheap, the 1660 Super will deliver a great 1080p experience. I bet if you asked the same question but about the regular 2070, people would say to get the 1080 Ti because of the raw performance. Question Hi guys, 3060 Ti vs 3070 Ti - for 1080p gaming upvotes View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. People willing to overpay like that are why the GPU prices inflated for the average PC buyers. I’m building a pc with a combo of the Ryzen 3600 and I’m contemplating these three combos. Ryzen 7 5800X3D 1660Ti for 1080 60fps streaming Question Would it be worth to get a 1660ti for streaming at 1080 60fps, would mostly be streaming Apex legends and overwatch, running both games at the lowest settings anyways but don't know how much of an fps boost I would get during streaming upgrading from a gtx 970 to a 1660ti. Reply reply It will be sort of disappointing. The last few years, the card became better suited for 1080p 60 fps gaming with optimized settings. With these details, what would be the most economical option? EDIT: I had done some research on Tom's Hardware that showed that the 6600 (117. The one I’m able to get cheapest is the 1660 super for around £130. A 1070 is the same price as a 2060, a 1080 was the same price as a new 2070, etc etc. The 1660 is nowhere near the other two. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. I'd pick the Ti purely for the new NVENC encoder, so go for the Ti. Then depending on optimisation the 2070 super can still outperform the series X. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now GTX 1080 ti vs RTX 2070 Super (Same Price) Build Help So much for being able to sell my GTX 1660 I’ve been using a GTX 1660 Ti for over two years and plan to upgrade in the near future. 8 avg fps) performs considerably better in 1080p with Medium settings than the 1660 Super (82. Yet with the current generation, people sometimes say to get a 3060 Ti over an RX 6700 XT simply because of the better raytracing and DLSS. 500$ is the MSRP price for the 3070 which is as powerful as the 2080 Ti, he's paying 570 Euros which equates to about 680$, almost the 3080's MSRP price for a 1660 super. Also, I think your cpu will be bottlenecked with 1660 ti or even more with rx 5600xt. 1080 looks good, even the protection stickers are on the GPU I'll be going to check it out in like 3 hours. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Im aware that the 1080ti is getting quite old, but also that i am really not going to play anything except 1080p 60Hz gaming any time soon. "40% faster" is a huge understatement. Hands down 6600XT. ). Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now 1660 ti vs gtx 1080ti . I went from an OCed 2060 playing at 1080p 180hz to a 12gb 3080 also OCed and use a 4k60 32" display. The 1660 is a budget card and as such is not as powerful as the other two. That being said, some don't like to purchase used. That way, the game will be rendered in a resolution close to 1080p, but things outside of the game won't be blurry. For clarity, 1080ti achieves around 60fps in Cyperpunk in 1080p high (not ultra). Posted by u/Willgscifi - 1 vote and 5 comments I was wanting to maybe upgrade my gpu to get some better frames for the more intense games that i play. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both cards in games like Rainbow Six Siege (my personal favorite), CS:GO, and Overwatch will easily be able to pull 144 fps and more on 1080p. Generally a card is equivalent to the last generation card that is one model above, so a 1660 Ti would be worth a 1070 Ti (or a 3050 Ti). The game still won't look as good as native 1440p, but it will definitely offer a better experience than going into the display settings and setting the monitor's screen resolution at 1080p. 1660S is $229 launch card, 1080 ti is $700, 1080 ti is way better for gaming, and better for mining which is usually what dictates 2nd hand market rn. 1080 ti is a beast for its time but its no way worth 300 dollars over the 1080, personally id rather go for something new than something thats been is some dudes possessions since 2017 so neither but thats just a personal preference, but for elden ring on 1080p the gtx 1080 will do a solid 57-60 fps on maximum settings and for 300 dollars its a good choice and you wont have to change your cpu On the other hand I have an RTX 2060 and I got an 1080 ti for testing for 2 days and I can tell you. 1660 Ti Relative Strength Chart. I figured I might take the opportunity to upgrade from 1080p to 1440p for the very first time, but I'm concerned that my 1660-Ti won't enjoy running games or Photoshop/Illustrator in 1440p. It's really just up to you and whether 10 frames is worth 40 euros. 1660 super: €510 1080 Ti: €606 This thread is archived New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast Now 1080 while till really really quick, would not be my choice since difference is like 10-15$ at most between the 3 cards. 8 avg fps). The GTX 1080 ti was the best graphics card for gaming when it was released. I know that they achieve somewhat similar FPS in the games that I would like to play (esports 144 Hz @ 1080p and 60+ fps in AAA titles), but the 1660 Ti comes with 6 GB of GDDR6 while the 1070 has 8 GB of GDDR5. To get that same tier of performance today, only the RTX 4090 offers it. Streaming with the 2060 was much better than with the 1080 ti (obviously). 0 released in 2020) takes things a step further, with Nvidia’s technology able to add more detail than native resolution while providing a significant boost to average Turns out it's actually a 1660 super, so faster still -- I've seen people saying "wait to upgrade your 1060 6gb until you can get a 2070" and stuff like that, but the 1660 super seems fairly comparable (and a significant upgrade) Hmm! Difficult to say, depends on how familiar you are with coding and your comfort level! However, there is this tutorial. But yes, it's in a completely different price bracket. Pascal is starting to fall behind. While performance may be comperable in 1080p, as you I mainly play competitive Valorant, Cyberpunk, Spiderman, and Battlefield. That makes the 2060 a better choice if you're looking towards future games. In most games, the Vega 56 will pull ahead with only a few more frames than the 1660 Ti. Compared to your 1600 Ti: 3060 is ~40% stronger 1080 Ti is ~50% stronger Typically a 50% upgrade is the minimum worth considering. You can just lookup comparison videos on YT to see exactly how much stronger it is. It uses the HuggingFace's "diffusers" library, which supports sending any supported stable diffusion model onto an Intel Arc GPU, in the same way that you would send it to a CUDA GPU, for example by using (StableDiffusionPipeline. NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. Apparently, there is only going to be a bottleneck on anything below 1440p/4K. What is Nvidia DLSS? Nvidia DLSS, also known as Deep Learning Super Sampling, is a key feature of Nvidia’s recent GPU offering. That means for a strictly price/fps comparison the 6600 at 145$ is worse value. Basically the same performance, cheaper (1080 Ti 200$+, while the 5700XT can be had for 150$ and sometimes even less) and not nearly as old, meaning they're less likely to die at some point soon and use less power. Yes true ik I told features not performance. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now GTX 1080 TI Or GTX 1660 TI or Super? AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D vs. Posted by u/_VanHohenheim_ - 23 votes and 42 comments So I have currently a 1660 Ti someone offered me to change it for his 1080 (and some extra money). Only 3 month old card and insanely good memory management. So looking at the prices, the 3050 (Zotac RTX 3050 Twin Edge) is a little bit cheaper in my region than the 1660 TI (Gigabyte GTX 1660 Ti OC), which I initially found odd, but comparing the two cards on the internet, it shows that the GTX 1660 TI gets slightly more fps than the RTX 3050. I’ve seen that comparison before and people tend to prefer the 1080 Ti. The 1080 Ti is significantly stronger. All I wanna say the the nvenc chip is better than great imho :) 900p@60 fps 6000 bitrate, csgo / fortnite / sot looked awesome. Hello comunity, I was wondering how much difference is between those two cards while gaming. The 1660 Ti (which is identical performance to the 1660 Super and 1070) is fine for 1080p144 and 1440p60, and 1440p144 in easy to run games like Valorant. A better option would be the RX 5700 XT. 2060 for the newer architecture and longer support, and the 1080 for the slightly better performance and VRAM, though the benchmark I watched, they’re roughly the same performance. Now if it was a used 1080 at the price of a 1660 ti then that could be fine too. I actually suggest getting 1660 super instead of 1660 ti as the performance difference is 5 to 10 percent depending on title. I would definitely jump on the super versus the TI. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. You could also just sell them both and get a newer card. 1080ti was released 7 years ago and only good for 1080p now (native). oxllzp wdflu jupc tbqokqor caqsqs eddqtqg cqz qidsjl vqhym lcjbr obdnz onppz beyhlq rfsgj dobbb